https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index en-au 5 Australia's Commitment to 'Advance the Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples around the Globe' on the United Nations Human Rights Council https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:41652 Wed 10 Aug 2022 09:39:17 AEST ]]> Electronic Signatures and Lawyers: Potential Not Reached? https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:53971 Tue 23 Jan 2024 15:48:02 AEDT ]]> Is the tail wagging the dog? Finding a place for ADR in pre-action processes: practice and perception https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:39277 Thu 02 Jun 2022 15:05:23 AEST ]]> From the arbitration system to the Fair Work Act: the changing approach in Australia to voice and representation at work https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:16248 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:54:18 AEDT ]]> Legal education and the ageing population: building student knowledge and skills through experiential learning in collaboration with community organisations https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:30327 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:31:51 AEDT ]]> Contemporary private military firms under international law: an unregulated gold rush https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:3655 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:20:21 AEDT ]]> Is the tail wagging the dog? Finding a place for ADR in pre-action processes: practice and perception https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:39016 Fri 19 Aug 2022 15:47:18 AEST ]]> Neurodivergent women in 'clouded judgment' unconscionability cases-an intersectional feminist perspective https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:35257 Louth v Diprose. However, a significant aspect of Ms Louth’s identity is missing from these discussions: her neurodivergence (or mental illness). This article analyses the stereo typical treatment of women through the lenses of gender and neurodivergence in ‘clouded judgment’ unconscionability cases. This analysis is focused on the comparison of the use of stereotypes in Louth v Diprose and Williams v Maalouf. Each case allows vastly different outcomes for the neuro divergent female parties, but both cases reinforce prejudicial stereotypes. The article concludes with a discussion of how a myopic focus on a singular category of identity can hinder the creation of decisions that are more mindful of intersectional realities.]]> Fri 05 Jul 2019 12:13:19 AEST ]]>